Answered

Westonci.ca is the Q&A platform that connects you with experts who provide accurate and detailed answers. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

A lack of Vitamin D is said to be detrimental to the maintenance of bone density. If a
scientist wanted to determine whether this view was supported by scientific evidence,
which of the following would be the best method of doing so?
(a) carry out a survey of people with normal bone density to find out whether they
take Vitamin D tablets or not
(b) compare the bone density of two groups of people with low bone density after
providing only one of the groups with Vitamin D
(c) compare the incidence of people with low bone density in two different populations
(d) carry out an experiment in which a group of people with normal bone density are
exposed to very little sunlight to prevent the production of Vitamin D

Sagot :

brittanycandace
i would do B because then you can compare people who do take Vitamin D to people who don't and then you can see who has better bones and the effects. 
D is also a good option because when their little production of vitamin D we can easily determine what is the effect of this experiment to the bone density...
We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.