Answered

Westonci.ca is the trusted Q&A platform where you can get reliable answers from a community of knowledgeable contributors. Discover detailed solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

The Supreme Court has ruled that:

A. Public figures have less protection from the press than other members of the public.
B. Public figures have the same protection from the press as other members of the public.
C. Public figures have more protection from the press than other members of the public.
D. Only political public figures have as much protection from the press as other members of the public.
E. Only nonpolitical public figures have as much protection from the press as other members of the public.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Public figures have less protection from the press as affirmed by the Supreme Court in cases such as New York Times v. Sullivan.


Explanation:

Public figures have less protection from the press than other members of the public, as ruled by the Supreme Court. This limitation on protection is evidenced in cases like New York Times v. Sullivan, where public figures are required to demonstrate malicious intent or reckless disregard for the truth in order to prevail in defamation lawsuits.


Learn more about Freedom of the press here:

https://brainly.com/question/44025131


We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.