Discover a world of knowledge at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts come together to answer your questions. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a knowledgeable network of professionals. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.
Sagot :
To determine which reflection produces the given image of a line segment with the endpoints changing from [tex]\((-4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((-6, 4)\)[/tex] to [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex], let's analyze the possible reflections one by one.
### Original Endpoints:
1. [tex]\((-4, -6)\)[/tex]
2. [tex]\((-6, 4)\)[/tex]
### New Endpoints:
1. [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex]
2. [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex]
### Possible Reflections:
1. Reflection across the [tex]\(x\)[/tex]-axis:
- Transformation rule: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (x, -y)\)[/tex]
Applying this to the original points:
- [tex]\((-4, -6) \rightarrow (-4, 6)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((-6, 4) \rightarrow (-6, -4)\)[/tex]
The resulting points [tex]\((-4, 6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((-6, -4)\)[/tex] do not match the given new endpoints [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex]. Hence, this is not the correct reflection.
2. Reflection across the [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-axis:
- Transformation rule: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (-x, y)\)[/tex]
Applying this to the original points:
- [tex]\((-4, -6) \rightarrow (4, -6)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((-6, 4) \rightarrow (6, 4)\)[/tex]
The resulting points [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex] match the given new endpoints perfectly. Therefore, this is the correct reflection.
3. Reflection across the line [tex]\(y = x\)[/tex]:
- Transformation rule: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (y, x)\)[/tex]
Applying this to the original points:
- [tex]\((-4, -6) \rightarrow (-6, -4)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((-6, 4) \rightarrow (4, -6)\)[/tex]
The resulting points [tex]\((-6, -4)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] do not match the given new endpoints [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex]. Hence, this is not the correct reflection.
4. Reflection across the line [tex]\(y = -x\)[/tex]:
- Transformation rule: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (-y, -x)\)[/tex]
Applying this to the original points:
- [tex]\((-4, -6) \rightarrow (6, 4)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((-6, 4) \rightarrow (-4, -6)\)[/tex]
The resulting points [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((-4, -6)\)[/tex] might appear to match, but the order and signs of the points are incorrect compared to our desired new endpoints [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex]. Therefore, this is not the correct reflection.
### Conclusion:
The reflection that transforms the endpoints [tex]\((-4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((-6, 4)\)[/tex] to the new endpoints [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex] is a reflection across the [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-axis.
Thus, the correct answer is:
A reflection of the line segment across the [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-axis.
### Original Endpoints:
1. [tex]\((-4, -6)\)[/tex]
2. [tex]\((-6, 4)\)[/tex]
### New Endpoints:
1. [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex]
2. [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex]
### Possible Reflections:
1. Reflection across the [tex]\(x\)[/tex]-axis:
- Transformation rule: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (x, -y)\)[/tex]
Applying this to the original points:
- [tex]\((-4, -6) \rightarrow (-4, 6)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((-6, 4) \rightarrow (-6, -4)\)[/tex]
The resulting points [tex]\((-4, 6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((-6, -4)\)[/tex] do not match the given new endpoints [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex]. Hence, this is not the correct reflection.
2. Reflection across the [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-axis:
- Transformation rule: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (-x, y)\)[/tex]
Applying this to the original points:
- [tex]\((-4, -6) \rightarrow (4, -6)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((-6, 4) \rightarrow (6, 4)\)[/tex]
The resulting points [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex] match the given new endpoints perfectly. Therefore, this is the correct reflection.
3. Reflection across the line [tex]\(y = x\)[/tex]:
- Transformation rule: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (y, x)\)[/tex]
Applying this to the original points:
- [tex]\((-4, -6) \rightarrow (-6, -4)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((-6, 4) \rightarrow (4, -6)\)[/tex]
The resulting points [tex]\((-6, -4)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] do not match the given new endpoints [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex]. Hence, this is not the correct reflection.
4. Reflection across the line [tex]\(y = -x\)[/tex]:
- Transformation rule: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (-y, -x)\)[/tex]
Applying this to the original points:
- [tex]\((-4, -6) \rightarrow (6, 4)\)[/tex]
- [tex]\((-6, 4) \rightarrow (-4, -6)\)[/tex]
The resulting points [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((-4, -6)\)[/tex] might appear to match, but the order and signs of the points are incorrect compared to our desired new endpoints [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex]. Therefore, this is not the correct reflection.
### Conclusion:
The reflection that transforms the endpoints [tex]\((-4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((-6, 4)\)[/tex] to the new endpoints [tex]\((4, -6)\)[/tex] and [tex]\((6, 4)\)[/tex] is a reflection across the [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-axis.
Thus, the correct answer is:
A reflection of the line segment across the [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-axis.
We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.
