Westonci.ca offers quick and accurate answers to your questions. Join our community and get the insights you need today. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
Final answer:
Students should have similar rights in school as outside of school to protect freedom of expression, justices in Tinker v. Des Moines had different views on the case, referencing other cases provides legal context.
Explanation:
Answers:
- Justice Fortas ruled in favor of the students because students do not lose their First Amendment rights at school and the school lacked evidence of substantial disruption caused by the armbands.
- Justice Black disagreed due to his belief that schools have the right to regulate conduct to prevent disturbances and maintain order, and he argued that the majority's decision could endanger the school's ability to provide a conducive learning environment.
Why Judges Reference Other Cases:
Judges reference other cases to provide legal precedent and context for their decisions, showing how past rulings influence current interpretations of the law.
Students' Rights in School:
Students should have similar rights in school as outside of school to ensure their freedom of expression and speech is protected, fostering a democratic environment where diverse viewpoints can be shared without fear of censorship.
Learn more about Tinker v. Des Moines here:
https://brainly.com/question/34196784
We appreciate your time on our site. Don't hesitate to return whenever you have more questions or need further clarification. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.