Welcome to Westonci.ca, the Q&A platform where your questions are met with detailed answers from experienced experts. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.

6. Which of the following can better be regarded as a universal set to apply set operations on the sets [tex]A =\{-1,1,2,3, \ldots, 20\}[/tex] and [tex]B =\left\{0,3, \frac{10}{3}, 1\right\}$?

A. The set of natural numbers.
B. The set of integer numbers.
C. The set of irrational numbers.
D. The set of rational numbers.


Sagot :

To determine the most suitable universal set for performing set operations on the sets [tex]\( A \)[/tex] and [tex]\( B \)[/tex], let's closely examine the elements of each set and compare them to the given sets.

Set [tex]\( A \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ A = \{-1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20\} \][/tex]

Set [tex]\( B \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ B = \left\{0, 3, \frac{10}{3}, 1\right\} \][/tex]

Now, let's analyze both sets in light of the provided options for the universal set:

- Option A: The set of natural numbers:
- Natural numbers include [tex]\(\{1, 2, 3, 4, \ldots\}\)[/tex].
- However, neither [tex]\( -1 \)[/tex] nor [tex]\( 0 \)[/tex] nor fractional numbers (like [tex]\(\frac{10}{3}\)[/tex]) are natural numbers.
- Since [tex]\( -1 \)[/tex] and [tex]\(\frac{10}{3}\)[/tex] are included in sets [tex]\( A \)[/tex] and [tex]\( B \)[/tex], natural numbers are not sufficient as a universal set.

- Option B: The set of integer numbers:
- Integers include [tex]\(\{\ldots, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, \ldots\}\)[/tex].
- While integers cover most elements, they do not include fractional numbers such as [tex]\(\frac{10}{3}\)[/tex].
- Therefore, the set of integers is not comprehensive enough, given [tex]\(\frac{10}{3}\)[/tex] in set [tex]\( B \)[/tex].

- Option C: The set of irrational numbers:
- Irrational numbers include numbers like [tex]\(\pi\)[/tex] and [tex]\(\sqrt{2}\)[/tex], which cannot be expressed as a ratio of two integers.
- Because none of the elements in sets [tex]\( A \)[/tex] and [tex]\( B \)[/tex] are irrational numbers, irrational numbers cannot serve as the universal set.

- Option D: The set of rational numbers:
- Rational numbers are numbers that can be expressed as a ratio of two integers, which includes integers and fractions.
- The set [tex]\(\{-1, 1, 2, 3, ..., 20\}\)[/tex] in set [tex]\( A \)[/tex] and the set [tex]\(\{0, 3, \frac{10}{3}, 1\}\)[/tex] in set [tex]\( B \)[/tex] are all rational numbers.
- Therefore, the rational numbers set comprehensively covers all elements in both sets [tex]\( A \)[/tex] and [tex]\( B \)[/tex].

Given the analysis, the set of rational numbers is the best choice as the universal set for performing set operations on sets [tex]\( A \)[/tex] and [tex]\( B \)[/tex].

Thus, the answer is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{4} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \text{D. The set of rational numbers.} \][/tex]
Thank you for choosing our service. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.