At Westonci.ca, we connect you with experts who provide detailed answers to your most pressing questions. Start exploring now! Discover solutions to your questions from experienced professionals across multiple fields on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
To determine the equation that correctly models the relationship between a salesperson's weekly sales ([tex]\(s\)[/tex]) and their weekly earnings ([tex]\(e\)[/tex]), we start by analyzing the components of their earnings:
1. The salesperson earns a fixed amount of [tex]\( \$200 \)[/tex] per week regardless of their sales.
2. Additionally, they earn a [tex]\( 4\% \)[/tex] commission on their sales [tex]\( s \)[/tex].
We need to express this relationship mathematically.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1. Fixed Earnings:
The salesperson earns [tex]\( \$200 \)[/tex] per week as a base salary. This is a fixed amount added to their total earnings.
2. Commission Earnings:
The salesperson earns a commission of [tex]\( 4\% \)[/tex] of their sales [tex]\( s \)[/tex]. To find [tex]\( 4\% \)[/tex] of [tex]\( s \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ \text{Commission} = 0.04 \times s \][/tex]
This represents the additional amount earned based on sales.
3. Total Earnings:
The total weekly earnings [tex]\( e \)[/tex] is the sum of the fixed earnings and the commission earnings. Therefore, we add the fixed salary to the commission:
[tex]\[ e = 200 + 0.04 \times s \][/tex]
This equation captures both the fixed earnings and the variable earnings from the commission.
4. Matching the Equations to Options:
We need to check which of the given options matches the derived equation [tex]\( e = 200 + 0.04s \)[/tex]:
- Option 1: [tex]\( e = \frac{200s + 4}{100} \)[/tex]
This option does not correctly represent the relationship.
- Option 2: [tex]\( e = 200s + 4 \)[/tex]
This option incorrectly scales the fixed earnings with sales.
- Option 3: [tex]\( e = 4s + 200 \)[/tex]
This option uses a [tex]\(4\)[/tex] instead of [tex]\(0.04\)[/tex], which would be incorrect.
- Option 4: [tex]\( e = \frac{4}{100} s + 200 \)[/tex]
Simplifying [tex]\(\frac{4}{100}\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ \frac{4}{100} = 0.04 \][/tex]
Therefore:
[tex]\[ e = 0.04s + 200 \][/tex]
This matches our derived equation.
Thus, the correct equation that models the relationship between the salesperson's weekly sales [tex]\( s \)[/tex] and their weekly earnings [tex]\( e \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ e = \frac{4}{100}s + 200 \][/tex]
Therefore, the correct option is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{\frac{4}{100} s + 200} \][/tex]
1. The salesperson earns a fixed amount of [tex]\( \$200 \)[/tex] per week regardless of their sales.
2. Additionally, they earn a [tex]\( 4\% \)[/tex] commission on their sales [tex]\( s \)[/tex].
We need to express this relationship mathematically.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1. Fixed Earnings:
The salesperson earns [tex]\( \$200 \)[/tex] per week as a base salary. This is a fixed amount added to their total earnings.
2. Commission Earnings:
The salesperson earns a commission of [tex]\( 4\% \)[/tex] of their sales [tex]\( s \)[/tex]. To find [tex]\( 4\% \)[/tex] of [tex]\( s \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ \text{Commission} = 0.04 \times s \][/tex]
This represents the additional amount earned based on sales.
3. Total Earnings:
The total weekly earnings [tex]\( e \)[/tex] is the sum of the fixed earnings and the commission earnings. Therefore, we add the fixed salary to the commission:
[tex]\[ e = 200 + 0.04 \times s \][/tex]
This equation captures both the fixed earnings and the variable earnings from the commission.
4. Matching the Equations to Options:
We need to check which of the given options matches the derived equation [tex]\( e = 200 + 0.04s \)[/tex]:
- Option 1: [tex]\( e = \frac{200s + 4}{100} \)[/tex]
This option does not correctly represent the relationship.
- Option 2: [tex]\( e = 200s + 4 \)[/tex]
This option incorrectly scales the fixed earnings with sales.
- Option 3: [tex]\( e = 4s + 200 \)[/tex]
This option uses a [tex]\(4\)[/tex] instead of [tex]\(0.04\)[/tex], which would be incorrect.
- Option 4: [tex]\( e = \frac{4}{100} s + 200 \)[/tex]
Simplifying [tex]\(\frac{4}{100}\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ \frac{4}{100} = 0.04 \][/tex]
Therefore:
[tex]\[ e = 0.04s + 200 \][/tex]
This matches our derived equation.
Thus, the correct equation that models the relationship between the salesperson's weekly sales [tex]\( s \)[/tex] and their weekly earnings [tex]\( e \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ e = \frac{4}{100}s + 200 \][/tex]
Therefore, the correct option is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{\frac{4}{100} s + 200} \][/tex]
We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Westonci.ca is committed to providing accurate answers. Come back soon for more trustworthy information.