Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, where your questions are met with accurate answers from a community of experts and enthusiasts. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately from our dedicated community of professionals. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.

Which term describes the idea that the Supreme Court can take a vigorous or active approach when reviewing the actions of other governmental branches?

A. Judicial activism
B. Judicial restraint
C. Legal activism
D. Common law practice

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Judicial activism involves actively reviewing and potentially overturning decisions by other branches of government to protect individual rights. Judicial restraint, on the other hand, suggests judges should defer decisions to elected branches and focus on a narrow interpretation of the law.


Explanation:

Judicial activism is a judicial philosophy where judges actively review and potentially overturn decisions or actions by other branches of government, aiming to protect individual rights and liberties. This approach involves judges taking a vigorous or active role in interpreting the Constitution. In contrast, judicial restraint advocates for judges to defer decisions to elected branches and focus on a narrower interpretation of the law.


Learn more about Judicial activism and judicial restraint here:

https://brainly.com/question/29545866


We appreciate your time on our site. Don't hesitate to return whenever you have more questions or need further clarification. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.