Answered

Westonci.ca connects you with experts who provide insightful answers to your questions. Join us today and start learning! Get immediate and reliable answers to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.

Which case held that an encounter would be deemed consensual if a reasonable person in the suspect's position would feel free to decline the officers' requests or otherwise terminate the encounter?

A. People v. Cartwright
B. US v. Drayton
C. Florida v. Bostick (1991)

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

In legal contexts, consensual encounters with law enforcement are defined by the suspect's ability to end the interaction, exemplified by the Florida v. Bostick case and guidelines set in Terry v. Ohio.


Explanation:

Consensual encounters with law enforcement are characterized by the notion that a reasonable person in the suspect's position would feel free to decline officers' requests or end the encounter.

In Florida v. Bostick (1991), the Supreme Court held that if a person feels free to terminate the encounter with police, it can be deemed consensual, even if in a police-citizen interaction.

Similarly, Terry v. Ohio (1968) established guidelines for police stops based on reasonable suspicion, offering insight into lawful encounters between individuals and law enforcement.


Learn more about Legal Consent and Police Encounters here:

https://brainly.com/question/33903563


Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.