Welcome to Westonci.ca, where curiosity meets expertise. Ask any question and receive fast, accurate answers from our knowledgeable community. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.
Sagot :
To solve this question, we need to determine which one of the given numbers produces a rational number when multiplied by 0.25. Let's analyze each option step by step.
### Definitions:
- Rational Number: Any number that can be expressed as the quotient or fraction [tex]\(\frac{p}{q}\)[/tex] of two integers, where [tex]\(p\)[/tex] and [tex]\(q\)[/tex] are integers and [tex]\(q \neq 0\)[/tex].
### Analysis of each option:
1. Option A: [tex]\(0.54713218\)[/tex]
- Multiplying by 0.25:
- [tex]\(0.25 \times 0.54713218 = 0.136783045\)[/tex]
- 0.136783045 is a decimal that does not obviously simplify to a fraction of two integers, meaning we cannot confirm it’s rational just from this multiplication.
2. Option B: [tex]\( -\sqrt{15} \)[/tex]
- Multiplying by 0.25:
- [tex]\(0.25 \times -\sqrt{15} = -0.25 \sqrt{15}\)[/tex]
- Since [tex]\(\sqrt{15}\)[/tex] is an irrational number, multiplying by -0.25 (a rational number) will still result in an irrational number.
3. Option C: [tex]\(0.45\)[/tex]
- Multiplying by 0.25:
- [tex]\(0.25 \times 0.45 = 0.1125\)[/tex]
- 0.1125 is a decimal, and on further investigation (0.1125 = [tex]\(\frac{9}{80}\)[/tex]) it could potentially be rational but we need clear-cut identification.
4. Option D: [tex]\(\pi\)[/tex]
- Multiplying by 0.25:
- [tex]\(0.25 \times \pi = 0.25 \pi\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(\pi\)[/tex] is an irrational number, so any real multiple of [tex]\(\pi\)[/tex] will still be an irrational number.
### Conclusion:
None of the given options multiplied by 0.25 result in a clear-cut rational number without further conversion or simplification. Therefore, after detailed consideration, it is evident that there isn't a definitive rational result from any of the options provided when multiplied by 0.25. Thus, the correct conclusion is:
None of the options (A, B, C, D) produces a rational number when multiplied by 0.25.
### Definitions:
- Rational Number: Any number that can be expressed as the quotient or fraction [tex]\(\frac{p}{q}\)[/tex] of two integers, where [tex]\(p\)[/tex] and [tex]\(q\)[/tex] are integers and [tex]\(q \neq 0\)[/tex].
### Analysis of each option:
1. Option A: [tex]\(0.54713218\)[/tex]
- Multiplying by 0.25:
- [tex]\(0.25 \times 0.54713218 = 0.136783045\)[/tex]
- 0.136783045 is a decimal that does not obviously simplify to a fraction of two integers, meaning we cannot confirm it’s rational just from this multiplication.
2. Option B: [tex]\( -\sqrt{15} \)[/tex]
- Multiplying by 0.25:
- [tex]\(0.25 \times -\sqrt{15} = -0.25 \sqrt{15}\)[/tex]
- Since [tex]\(\sqrt{15}\)[/tex] is an irrational number, multiplying by -0.25 (a rational number) will still result in an irrational number.
3. Option C: [tex]\(0.45\)[/tex]
- Multiplying by 0.25:
- [tex]\(0.25 \times 0.45 = 0.1125\)[/tex]
- 0.1125 is a decimal, and on further investigation (0.1125 = [tex]\(\frac{9}{80}\)[/tex]) it could potentially be rational but we need clear-cut identification.
4. Option D: [tex]\(\pi\)[/tex]
- Multiplying by 0.25:
- [tex]\(0.25 \times \pi = 0.25 \pi\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(\pi\)[/tex] is an irrational number, so any real multiple of [tex]\(\pi\)[/tex] will still be an irrational number.
### Conclusion:
None of the given options multiplied by 0.25 result in a clear-cut rational number without further conversion or simplification. Therefore, after detailed consideration, it is evident that there isn't a definitive rational result from any of the options provided when multiplied by 0.25. Thus, the correct conclusion is:
None of the options (A, B, C, D) produces a rational number when multiplied by 0.25.
We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.