Westonci.ca is the best place to get answers to your questions, provided by a community of experienced and knowledgeable experts. Discover comprehensive answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our user-friendly platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
Alright, let's proceed by expressing each logarithm in terms of \(\ln 3\) and \(\ln 5\).
### 1. \(\ln \frac{81}{125}\)
The term \(\frac{81}{125}\) can be broken down into:
[tex]\[ \ln \frac{81}{125} = \ln 81 - \ln 125 \][/tex]
Next, let's express 81 and 125 in terms of their prime factors:
[tex]\[ 81 = 3^4 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ 125 = 5^3 \][/tex]
So, we have:
[tex]\[ \ln 81 = \ln (3^4) = 4 \ln 3 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \ln 125 = \ln (5^3) = 3 \ln 5 \][/tex]
Combining these, we get:
[tex]\[ \ln \frac{81}{125} = 4 \ln 3 - 3 \ln 5 \][/tex]
### 2. \(4 \ln 5 - 3 \ln 3\)
This expression is already in terms of \(\ln 3\) and \(\ln 5\). Nothing else needs to be done:
[tex]\[ 4 \ln 5 - 3 \ln 3 \][/tex]
### 3. \(5 \ln 3 - 3 \ln 4\)
We observe that \( \ln 4 \) can be expressed using logarithms of 2:
[tex]\[ \ln 4 = \ln (2^2) = 2 \ln 2 \][/tex]
Unfortunately, we do not have \(\ln 2\) in our given basis (\(\ln 3\) and \(\ln 5\)), so this expression is as simplified as it can get in terms of the given bases:
[tex]\[ 5 \ln 3 - 3 \ln 4 \][/tex]
### 4. \(4 \ln 3 - 3 \ln 5\)
This expression is already in terms of \(\ln 3\) and \(\ln 5\). No further modifications are needed:
[tex]\[ 4 \ln 3 - 3 \ln 5 \][/tex]
### 5. \(3 \ln 4 - 5 \ln 3\)
Again, we can express \( \ln 4 \) in terms of \(\ln 2\):
[tex]\[ \ln 4 = 2 \ln 2 \][/tex]
Given we do not have \(\ln 2\) in our basis (\(\ln 3\) and \(\ln 5\)), we leave this as:
[tex]\[ 3 \ln 4 - 5 \ln 3 \][/tex]
Now let's summarize the results and provide their numerical values:
### Numerical Results:
1. \(\ln \frac{81}{125} = 4 \ln 3 - 3 \ln 5 \approx -0.4339\)
2. \(4 \ln 5 - 3 \ln 3 \approx 3.1419\)
3. \(5 \ln 3 - 3 \ln 4 \approx 1.3342\)
4. \(4 \ln 3 - 3 \ln 5 \approx -0.4339\)
5. \(3 \ln 4 - 5 \ln 3 \approx -1.3342\)
Thus, we have expressed all given logarithms in terms of [tex]\(\ln 3\)[/tex] and [tex]\(\ln 5\)[/tex], and provided their approximate numerical values.
### 1. \(\ln \frac{81}{125}\)
The term \(\frac{81}{125}\) can be broken down into:
[tex]\[ \ln \frac{81}{125} = \ln 81 - \ln 125 \][/tex]
Next, let's express 81 and 125 in terms of their prime factors:
[tex]\[ 81 = 3^4 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ 125 = 5^3 \][/tex]
So, we have:
[tex]\[ \ln 81 = \ln (3^4) = 4 \ln 3 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \ln 125 = \ln (5^3) = 3 \ln 5 \][/tex]
Combining these, we get:
[tex]\[ \ln \frac{81}{125} = 4 \ln 3 - 3 \ln 5 \][/tex]
### 2. \(4 \ln 5 - 3 \ln 3\)
This expression is already in terms of \(\ln 3\) and \(\ln 5\). Nothing else needs to be done:
[tex]\[ 4 \ln 5 - 3 \ln 3 \][/tex]
### 3. \(5 \ln 3 - 3 \ln 4\)
We observe that \( \ln 4 \) can be expressed using logarithms of 2:
[tex]\[ \ln 4 = \ln (2^2) = 2 \ln 2 \][/tex]
Unfortunately, we do not have \(\ln 2\) in our given basis (\(\ln 3\) and \(\ln 5\)), so this expression is as simplified as it can get in terms of the given bases:
[tex]\[ 5 \ln 3 - 3 \ln 4 \][/tex]
### 4. \(4 \ln 3 - 3 \ln 5\)
This expression is already in terms of \(\ln 3\) and \(\ln 5\). No further modifications are needed:
[tex]\[ 4 \ln 3 - 3 \ln 5 \][/tex]
### 5. \(3 \ln 4 - 5 \ln 3\)
Again, we can express \( \ln 4 \) in terms of \(\ln 2\):
[tex]\[ \ln 4 = 2 \ln 2 \][/tex]
Given we do not have \(\ln 2\) in our basis (\(\ln 3\) and \(\ln 5\)), we leave this as:
[tex]\[ 3 \ln 4 - 5 \ln 3 \][/tex]
Now let's summarize the results and provide their numerical values:
### Numerical Results:
1. \(\ln \frac{81}{125} = 4 \ln 3 - 3 \ln 5 \approx -0.4339\)
2. \(4 \ln 5 - 3 \ln 3 \approx 3.1419\)
3. \(5 \ln 3 - 3 \ln 4 \approx 1.3342\)
4. \(4 \ln 3 - 3 \ln 5 \approx -0.4339\)
5. \(3 \ln 4 - 5 \ln 3 \approx -1.3342\)
Thus, we have expressed all given logarithms in terms of [tex]\(\ln 3\)[/tex] and [tex]\(\ln 5\)[/tex], and provided their approximate numerical values.
The answer is C since ln(81/125) can be simplified into ln81-ln125. That can be simplified again to 4ln3-3ln5
Thanks for using our service. We aim to provide the most accurate answers for all your queries. Visit us again for more insights. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Find reliable answers at Westonci.ca. Visit us again for the latest updates and expert advice.