Find the information you're looking for at Westonci.ca, the trusted Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding precise answers from a network of experienced professionals. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To find [tex]\(E(X)\)[/tex], the expected number of bases for Albert Pujols in a typical at bat in 2009, we use the formula for the expected value of a discrete random variable. The expected value [tex]\(E(X)\)[/tex] is given by the sum of each outcome multiplied by its probability.
First, let's summarize the data:
- [tex]\(0\)[/tex] bases: [tex]\(382\)[/tex] times
- [tex]\(1\)[/tex] base: [tex]\(93\)[/tex] times
- [tex]\(2\)[/tex] bases: [tex]\(45\)[/tex] times
- [tex]\(3\)[/tex] bases: [tex]\(1\)[/tex] time
- [tex]\(4\)[/tex] bases: [tex]\(47\)[/tex] times
The total number of at bats is [tex]\(568\)[/tex]. The probability of each outcome is the number of times that outcome occurred divided by the total number of at bats.
We can calculate the probabilities as follows:
- Probability of [tex]\(0\)[/tex] bases: [tex]\(\frac{382}{568}\)[/tex]
- Probability of [tex]\(1\)[/tex] base: [tex]\(\frac{93}{568}\)[/tex]
- Probability of [tex]\(2\)[/tex] bases: [tex]\(\frac{45}{568}\)[/tex]
- Probability of [tex]\(3\)[/tex] bases: [tex]\(\frac{1}{568}\)[/tex]
- Probability of [tex]\(4\)[/tex] bases: [tex]\(\frac{47}{568}\)[/tex]
Next, we multiply each outcome by its probability and sum the results to find [tex]\(E(X)\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ E(X) = 0 \cdot \frac{382}{568} + 1 \cdot \frac{93}{568} + 2 \cdot \frac{45}{568} + 3 \cdot \frac{1}{568} + 4 \cdot \frac{47}{568} \][/tex]
Breaking this into parts:
[tex]\[ 0 \cdot \frac{382}{568} = 0 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ 1 \cdot \frac{93}{568} = \frac{93}{568} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ 2 \cdot \frac{45}{568} = \frac{90}{568} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ 3 \cdot \frac{1}{568} = \frac{3}{568} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ 4 \cdot \frac{47}{568} = \frac{188}{568} \][/tex]
Now, summing these values:
[tex]\[ E(X) = 0 + \frac{93}{568} + \frac{90}{568} + \frac{3}{568} + \frac{188}{568} \][/tex]
Combine the fractions:
[tex]\[ E(X) = \frac{93 + 90 + 3 + 188}{568} = \frac{374}{568} \][/tex]
Using division, we get:
[tex]\[ E(X) \approx 0.6584507042253521 \][/tex]
To the nearest thousandth, [tex]\(E(X)\)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ 0.658 \][/tex]
Therefore, the correct answer is:
B. 0.658
First, let's summarize the data:
- [tex]\(0\)[/tex] bases: [tex]\(382\)[/tex] times
- [tex]\(1\)[/tex] base: [tex]\(93\)[/tex] times
- [tex]\(2\)[/tex] bases: [tex]\(45\)[/tex] times
- [tex]\(3\)[/tex] bases: [tex]\(1\)[/tex] time
- [tex]\(4\)[/tex] bases: [tex]\(47\)[/tex] times
The total number of at bats is [tex]\(568\)[/tex]. The probability of each outcome is the number of times that outcome occurred divided by the total number of at bats.
We can calculate the probabilities as follows:
- Probability of [tex]\(0\)[/tex] bases: [tex]\(\frac{382}{568}\)[/tex]
- Probability of [tex]\(1\)[/tex] base: [tex]\(\frac{93}{568}\)[/tex]
- Probability of [tex]\(2\)[/tex] bases: [tex]\(\frac{45}{568}\)[/tex]
- Probability of [tex]\(3\)[/tex] bases: [tex]\(\frac{1}{568}\)[/tex]
- Probability of [tex]\(4\)[/tex] bases: [tex]\(\frac{47}{568}\)[/tex]
Next, we multiply each outcome by its probability and sum the results to find [tex]\(E(X)\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ E(X) = 0 \cdot \frac{382}{568} + 1 \cdot \frac{93}{568} + 2 \cdot \frac{45}{568} + 3 \cdot \frac{1}{568} + 4 \cdot \frac{47}{568} \][/tex]
Breaking this into parts:
[tex]\[ 0 \cdot \frac{382}{568} = 0 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ 1 \cdot \frac{93}{568} = \frac{93}{568} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ 2 \cdot \frac{45}{568} = \frac{90}{568} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ 3 \cdot \frac{1}{568} = \frac{3}{568} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ 4 \cdot \frac{47}{568} = \frac{188}{568} \][/tex]
Now, summing these values:
[tex]\[ E(X) = 0 + \frac{93}{568} + \frac{90}{568} + \frac{3}{568} + \frac{188}{568} \][/tex]
Combine the fractions:
[tex]\[ E(X) = \frac{93 + 90 + 3 + 188}{568} = \frac{374}{568} \][/tex]
Using division, we get:
[tex]\[ E(X) \approx 0.6584507042253521 \][/tex]
To the nearest thousandth, [tex]\(E(X)\)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ 0.658 \][/tex]
Therefore, the correct answer is:
B. 0.658
Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.