Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where our expert community is always ready to help with accurate information. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately from our dedicated community of professionals. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.
Sagot :
Let's analyze the games and their probabilities in detail.
### Game Details and Theoretical Probabilities:
Game A: Get-it-Rolling
- Win condition: Rolling a 5 on an eight-sided die.
- Theoretical probability of winning (P_A_theoretical): [tex]\( \frac{1}{8} \)[/tex].
Game B: Bag-of-Tokens
- Win condition: Drawing the red token from a bag of 7 different colored tokens.
- Theoretical probability of winning (P_B_theoretical): [tex]\( \frac{1}{7} \)[/tex].
Game C: Pick-Your-Tile
- Win condition: Picking the tile with the number 9 out of 12 tiles.
- Theoretical probability of winning (P_C_theoretical): [tex]\( \frac{1}{12} \)[/tex].
### Experimental Probabilities:
From the given data table:
1. Get-it-Rolling (A)
- Wins: 26
- Losses: 173
- Total attempts: [tex]\( 26 + 173 = 199 \)[/tex]
- Experimental probability (P_A_experimental): [tex]\( \frac{26}{199} \)[/tex].
2. Bag-of-Tokens (B)
- Wins: 54
- Losses: 141
- Total attempts: [tex]\( 54 + 141 = 195 \)[/tex]
- Experimental probability (P_B_experimental): [tex]\( \frac{54}{195} \)[/tex].
3. Pick-Your-Tile (C)
- Wins: 17
- Losses: 175
- Total attempts: [tex]\( 17 + 175 = 192 \)[/tex]
- Experimental probability (P_C_experimental): [tex]\( \frac{17}{192} \)[/tex].
### Deviation Calculation:
To determine how closely each game's experimental probability aligns with its theoretical probability, we calculate the absolute deviations:
1. Get-it-Rolling (A):
- Deviation: [tex]\( \left| \frac{1}{8} - \frac{26}{199} \right| \)[/tex].
2. Bag-of-Tokens (B):
- Deviation: [tex]\( \left| \frac{1}{7} - \frac{54}{195} \right| \)[/tex].
3. Pick-Your-Tile (C):
- Deviation: [tex]\( \left| \frac{1}{12} - \frac{17}{192} \right| \)[/tex].
We then compare these deviations against a small tolerance level ([tex]\(\epsilon = 0.05\)[/tex]), which represents a close alignment.
### Conclusion:
Based on our analysis, here's how the games align with their theoretical probabilities:
- Game A's results align closely.
- Game B's results do not align closely.
- Game C's results align closely.
### Decision:
Given these observations:
Option B is correct:
"The results from both game A and game C align closely with the theoretical probability of winning those games, while the results from game B do not."
Thus, the correct answer is:
B. The results from both game A and game [tex]$C$[/tex] align closely with the theoretical probability of winning those games, while the results from game B do not.
### Game Details and Theoretical Probabilities:
Game A: Get-it-Rolling
- Win condition: Rolling a 5 on an eight-sided die.
- Theoretical probability of winning (P_A_theoretical): [tex]\( \frac{1}{8} \)[/tex].
Game B: Bag-of-Tokens
- Win condition: Drawing the red token from a bag of 7 different colored tokens.
- Theoretical probability of winning (P_B_theoretical): [tex]\( \frac{1}{7} \)[/tex].
Game C: Pick-Your-Tile
- Win condition: Picking the tile with the number 9 out of 12 tiles.
- Theoretical probability of winning (P_C_theoretical): [tex]\( \frac{1}{12} \)[/tex].
### Experimental Probabilities:
From the given data table:
1. Get-it-Rolling (A)
- Wins: 26
- Losses: 173
- Total attempts: [tex]\( 26 + 173 = 199 \)[/tex]
- Experimental probability (P_A_experimental): [tex]\( \frac{26}{199} \)[/tex].
2. Bag-of-Tokens (B)
- Wins: 54
- Losses: 141
- Total attempts: [tex]\( 54 + 141 = 195 \)[/tex]
- Experimental probability (P_B_experimental): [tex]\( \frac{54}{195} \)[/tex].
3. Pick-Your-Tile (C)
- Wins: 17
- Losses: 175
- Total attempts: [tex]\( 17 + 175 = 192 \)[/tex]
- Experimental probability (P_C_experimental): [tex]\( \frac{17}{192} \)[/tex].
### Deviation Calculation:
To determine how closely each game's experimental probability aligns with its theoretical probability, we calculate the absolute deviations:
1. Get-it-Rolling (A):
- Deviation: [tex]\( \left| \frac{1}{8} - \frac{26}{199} \right| \)[/tex].
2. Bag-of-Tokens (B):
- Deviation: [tex]\( \left| \frac{1}{7} - \frac{54}{195} \right| \)[/tex].
3. Pick-Your-Tile (C):
- Deviation: [tex]\( \left| \frac{1}{12} - \frac{17}{192} \right| \)[/tex].
We then compare these deviations against a small tolerance level ([tex]\(\epsilon = 0.05\)[/tex]), which represents a close alignment.
### Conclusion:
Based on our analysis, here's how the games align with their theoretical probabilities:
- Game A's results align closely.
- Game B's results do not align closely.
- Game C's results align closely.
### Decision:
Given these observations:
Option B is correct:
"The results from both game A and game C align closely with the theoretical probability of winning those games, while the results from game B do not."
Thus, the correct answer is:
B. The results from both game A and game [tex]$C$[/tex] align closely with the theoretical probability of winning those games, while the results from game B do not.
Thanks for stopping by. We are committed to providing the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.