Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions find answers from a community of knowledgeable experts. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our Q&A platform. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.

Proponents of judicial restraint would tend to have which of the following characteristics?

A. Belief in the Constitution as a flexible document
B. Respect for the roles of the other branches of government
C. Respect for contemporary political views over those of the Framers
D. Willingness to invalidate state law if necessary

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Judicial restraint is a judicial philosophy that emphasizes judges deferring to the decisions of other branches of government and upholding precedent.


Explanation:

Judicial restraint is a judicial philosophy in which judges are more likely to let stand the decisions or actions of the other branches of government. This approach involves respecting precedent, adhering to the original intent of the Constitution, and deferring to the legislature in matters of public policy.

Advocates of judicial restraint believe that the courts should not be heavily involved in making policy decisions and should leave those to the elected branches of government. They argue that judges, as unelected officials, should avoid political involvement and focus on interpreting laws based on existing legal principles.


Learn more about Judicial restraint here:

https://brainly.com/question/29545866


Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.