Find the information you're looking for at Westonci.ca, the trusted Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Our platform connects you with professionals ready to provide precise answers to all your questions in various areas of expertise. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.
Sagot :
Let's analyze the given sequences to determine if they are indeed the same.
We begin with the examined sequence: [tex]\(a_1=2\)[/tex], [tex]\(a_2=4\)[/tex], [tex]\(a_3=8\)[/tex], [tex]\(a_4=16\)[/tex], [tex]\(a_5=32\)[/tex], ...
Now, let's consider the recursive definition for this sequence:
- [tex]\(a_1=2\)[/tex]
- For [tex]\(n>1\)[/tex], [tex]\(a_n = 2 \cdot a_{n-1}\)[/tex]
We'll calculate the terms of the sequence using this recursive definition step by step.
1. [tex]\(a_1 = 2\)[/tex]
2. [tex]\(a_2 = 2 \cdot a_1 = 2 \cdot 2 = 4\)[/tex]
3. [tex]\(a_3 = 2 \cdot a_2 = 2 \cdot 4 = 8\)[/tex]
4. [tex]\(a_4 = 2 \cdot a_3 = 2 \cdot 8 = 16\)[/tex]
5. [tex]\(a_5 = 2 \cdot a_4 = 2 \cdot 16 = 32\)[/tex]
Now, compare the terms from the recursive definition with the given sequence:
- Given sequence: [tex]\(2, 4, 8, 16, 32\)[/tex]
- Calculated sequence: [tex]\(2, 4, 8, 16, 32\)[/tex]
Since the terms of the sequences match exactly, we can conclude that the given sequence is, indeed, the same as the sequence defined recursively.
Hence, the answer is A. True.
We begin with the examined sequence: [tex]\(a_1=2\)[/tex], [tex]\(a_2=4\)[/tex], [tex]\(a_3=8\)[/tex], [tex]\(a_4=16\)[/tex], [tex]\(a_5=32\)[/tex], ...
Now, let's consider the recursive definition for this sequence:
- [tex]\(a_1=2\)[/tex]
- For [tex]\(n>1\)[/tex], [tex]\(a_n = 2 \cdot a_{n-1}\)[/tex]
We'll calculate the terms of the sequence using this recursive definition step by step.
1. [tex]\(a_1 = 2\)[/tex]
2. [tex]\(a_2 = 2 \cdot a_1 = 2 \cdot 2 = 4\)[/tex]
3. [tex]\(a_3 = 2 \cdot a_2 = 2 \cdot 4 = 8\)[/tex]
4. [tex]\(a_4 = 2 \cdot a_3 = 2 \cdot 8 = 16\)[/tex]
5. [tex]\(a_5 = 2 \cdot a_4 = 2 \cdot 16 = 32\)[/tex]
Now, compare the terms from the recursive definition with the given sequence:
- Given sequence: [tex]\(2, 4, 8, 16, 32\)[/tex]
- Calculated sequence: [tex]\(2, 4, 8, 16, 32\)[/tex]
Since the terms of the sequences match exactly, we can conclude that the given sequence is, indeed, the same as the sequence defined recursively.
Hence, the answer is A. True.
We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.