Discover answers to your most pressing questions at Westonci.ca, the ultimate Q&A platform that connects you with expert solutions. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.
Sagot :
To determine the enthalpy of the reaction using the given enthalpies of formation from the table, we'll follow a systematic process. We'll use the formula for the change in enthalpy (ΔH_reaction):
[tex]\[ \Delta H_{\text {reaction}} = \sum \left( \Delta H_{f, \text {products}} \right) - \sum \left( \Delta H_{f, \text {reactants}} \right) \][/tex]
Let's consider a typical chemical reaction involving the formation of [tex]\( CO_2 \)[/tex] from graphite:
[tex]\[ \text{C (s, graphite)} + \text{O}_2 (\text{g}) \rightarrow \text{CO}_2 (\text{g}) \][/tex]
From the given table:
- ΔH_f for [tex]\(CO_2 (\text{g})\)[/tex] = -285.8 kJ/mol
- ΔH_f for [tex]\(\text{C (s, graphite)}\)[/tex] is missing but usually assumed as 0 kJ/mol (it's a standard state).
For [tex]\(O_2 (\text{g})\)[/tex], ΔH_f = 0 kJ/mol (by convention as a diatomic molecule in its elemental form).
Applying these values to the reaction:
Reactants:
[tex]\[ \Delta H_f (\text{C (s, graphite)}) + \Delta H_f (\text{O}_2 (\text{g})) = 0 + 0 = 0 \text{ kJ/mol} \][/tex]
Products:
[tex]\[ \Delta H_f (\text{CO}_2 (\text{g})) = -285.8 \text{ kJ/mol} \][/tex]
Now, plug these values into the enthalpy change formula:
[tex]\[ \Delta H_{\text{reaction}} = \Delta H_f (\text{products}) - \Delta H_f (\text{reactants}) \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \Delta H_{\text {reaction}} = -285.8 - 0 = -285.8 \text{ kJ/mol} \][/tex]
Thus, the enthalpy of the reaction is:
[tex]\[ -285.8 \text{ kJ/mol} \][/tex]
Even though the given set of answer options doesn't include [tex]\(-285.8 \text{ kJ/mol}\)[/tex] directly, this computed enthalpy value best represents the scenario described in the problem and calculations. If the context of the problem had more details about other reactants/products or specific reactions required to match the given options, then that would need to be revisited. But based on the current information, -285.8 kJ/mol is the enthalpy change, leading me to understand that there might be a mismatch between the option sets provided and the correct answer.
[tex]\[ \Delta H_{\text {reaction}} = \sum \left( \Delta H_{f, \text {products}} \right) - \sum \left( \Delta H_{f, \text {reactants}} \right) \][/tex]
Let's consider a typical chemical reaction involving the formation of [tex]\( CO_2 \)[/tex] from graphite:
[tex]\[ \text{C (s, graphite)} + \text{O}_2 (\text{g}) \rightarrow \text{CO}_2 (\text{g}) \][/tex]
From the given table:
- ΔH_f for [tex]\(CO_2 (\text{g})\)[/tex] = -285.8 kJ/mol
- ΔH_f for [tex]\(\text{C (s, graphite)}\)[/tex] is missing but usually assumed as 0 kJ/mol (it's a standard state).
For [tex]\(O_2 (\text{g})\)[/tex], ΔH_f = 0 kJ/mol (by convention as a diatomic molecule in its elemental form).
Applying these values to the reaction:
Reactants:
[tex]\[ \Delta H_f (\text{C (s, graphite)}) + \Delta H_f (\text{O}_2 (\text{g})) = 0 + 0 = 0 \text{ kJ/mol} \][/tex]
Products:
[tex]\[ \Delta H_f (\text{CO}_2 (\text{g})) = -285.8 \text{ kJ/mol} \][/tex]
Now, plug these values into the enthalpy change formula:
[tex]\[ \Delta H_{\text{reaction}} = \Delta H_f (\text{products}) - \Delta H_f (\text{reactants}) \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \Delta H_{\text {reaction}} = -285.8 - 0 = -285.8 \text{ kJ/mol} \][/tex]
Thus, the enthalpy of the reaction is:
[tex]\[ -285.8 \text{ kJ/mol} \][/tex]
Even though the given set of answer options doesn't include [tex]\(-285.8 \text{ kJ/mol}\)[/tex] directly, this computed enthalpy value best represents the scenario described in the problem and calculations. If the context of the problem had more details about other reactants/products or specific reactions required to match the given options, then that would need to be revisited. But based on the current information, -285.8 kJ/mol is the enthalpy change, leading me to understand that there might be a mismatch between the option sets provided and the correct answer.
We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We're dedicated to helping you find the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Don't hesitate to return for more.