Welcome to Westonci.ca, your one-stop destination for finding answers to all your questions. Join our expert community now! Discover detailed solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.
Sagot :
Sure, let's break down this question step by step to identify the correct transformations applied to the graph of [tex]\( f(x) = x^2 \)[/tex] to obtain [tex]\( g(x) = -3x^2 - 36x \)[/tex].
First, let's understand what each term in [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] does to the graph of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex]:
1. Transformation by the coefficient in front of [tex]\( x^2 \)[/tex]:
- The term [tex]\( -3x^2 \)[/tex] indicates a reflection across the x-axis and a vertical stretch by a factor of 3. This makes the graph narrower compared to the graph of [tex]\( f(x) = x^2 \)[/tex].
2. Horizontal shift and stretch/compression:
- The term [tex]\( -36x \)[/tex] affects the position of the vertex of the parabola. To find the vertex form of [tex]\( -3x^2 - 36x \)[/tex], you need to complete the square:
[tex]\[ g(x) = -3x^2 - 36x = -3(x^2 + 12x) \][/tex]
To complete the square, you take half of the coefficient of [tex]\( x \)[/tex] (which is 12), square it to get 36, and then add and subtract 36 inside the parentheses:
[tex]\[ -3(x^2 + 12x + 36 - 36) = -3((x + 6)^2 - 36) = -3(x + 6)^2 + 108 \][/tex]
- This shows the parabola is shifted horizontally to the left by 6 units and vertically up by 108 units due to the constant term.
Next, we match the transformations described in the options to those identified:
1. The graph of [tex]\( f(x) = x^2 \)[/tex] is made narrower:
- Yes, the coefficient [tex]\( -3 \)[/tex] makes the graph narrower.
2. The graph of [tex]\( f(x) = x^2 \)[/tex] is shifted right 6 units:
- The completed square form shows a shift left by 6 units, not right.
3. The graph of [tex]\( f(x) = x^2 \)[/tex] is shifted down 48 units:
- According to our completed square form, the graph is shifted up by 108 units, not down by 48.
4. The graph of [tex]\( f(x) = x^2 \)[/tex] is reflected over the y-axis:
- There is no indication of reflection over the y-axis; the reflection is over the x-axis due to the negative coefficient.
From these explanations:
- Transformation 1 (The graph is made narrower) is true.
- Transformation 4 (Reflection over the y-axis) is incorrect, but the equation does involve reflection over the x-axis.
Thus, the transformations applied include 'made narrower' and reflection over the x-axis.
The applied transformations that are correct according to the analysis are:
- Transformation: The graph of [tex]\( f(x)=x^2 \)[/tex] is made narrower.
- Transformation: Reflection over the x-axis.
The transformations indexed at 1, [tex]\( 4 \)[/tex] in your list. Therefore, the provided solution indicates:
```plaintext
[1, 4]
```
First, let's understand what each term in [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] does to the graph of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex]:
1. Transformation by the coefficient in front of [tex]\( x^2 \)[/tex]:
- The term [tex]\( -3x^2 \)[/tex] indicates a reflection across the x-axis and a vertical stretch by a factor of 3. This makes the graph narrower compared to the graph of [tex]\( f(x) = x^2 \)[/tex].
2. Horizontal shift and stretch/compression:
- The term [tex]\( -36x \)[/tex] affects the position of the vertex of the parabola. To find the vertex form of [tex]\( -3x^2 - 36x \)[/tex], you need to complete the square:
[tex]\[ g(x) = -3x^2 - 36x = -3(x^2 + 12x) \][/tex]
To complete the square, you take half of the coefficient of [tex]\( x \)[/tex] (which is 12), square it to get 36, and then add and subtract 36 inside the parentheses:
[tex]\[ -3(x^2 + 12x + 36 - 36) = -3((x + 6)^2 - 36) = -3(x + 6)^2 + 108 \][/tex]
- This shows the parabola is shifted horizontally to the left by 6 units and vertically up by 108 units due to the constant term.
Next, we match the transformations described in the options to those identified:
1. The graph of [tex]\( f(x) = x^2 \)[/tex] is made narrower:
- Yes, the coefficient [tex]\( -3 \)[/tex] makes the graph narrower.
2. The graph of [tex]\( f(x) = x^2 \)[/tex] is shifted right 6 units:
- The completed square form shows a shift left by 6 units, not right.
3. The graph of [tex]\( f(x) = x^2 \)[/tex] is shifted down 48 units:
- According to our completed square form, the graph is shifted up by 108 units, not down by 48.
4. The graph of [tex]\( f(x) = x^2 \)[/tex] is reflected over the y-axis:
- There is no indication of reflection over the y-axis; the reflection is over the x-axis due to the negative coefficient.
From these explanations:
- Transformation 1 (The graph is made narrower) is true.
- Transformation 4 (Reflection over the y-axis) is incorrect, but the equation does involve reflection over the x-axis.
Thus, the transformations applied include 'made narrower' and reflection over the x-axis.
The applied transformations that are correct according to the analysis are:
- Transformation: The graph of [tex]\( f(x)=x^2 \)[/tex] is made narrower.
- Transformation: Reflection over the x-axis.
The transformations indexed at 1, [tex]\( 4 \)[/tex] in your list. Therefore, the provided solution indicates:
```plaintext
[1, 4]
```
We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.
