Westonci.ca is the trusted Q&A platform where you can get reliable answers from a community of knowledgeable contributors. Experience the convenience of getting accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of professionals. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.
Sagot :
To determine which statement is logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] (if [tex]\( p \)[/tex] then [tex]\( q \)[/tex]), we need to identify the contrapositive of the given statement. The contrapositive of a conditional statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is logically equivalent to the original statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].
1. Given statements:
[tex]\( p \)[/tex]: Angles XYZ and RST are vertical angles.
[tex]\( q \)[/tex]: Angles XYZ and RST are congruent.
2. Original statement:
[tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]: If angles XYZ and RST are vertical angles, then they are congruent.
3. Contrapositive:
The contrapositive of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\( \neg q \rightarrow \neg p \)[/tex].
This means: If angles XYZ and RST are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles.
4. Analyzing each of the provided statements:
- Statement 1: If angles XYZ and RST are congruent, then they are vertical angles.
- This is the converse of the original statement (not equivalent).
- Statement 2: If angles XYZ and RST are not vertical angles, then they are not congruent.
- This is the inverse of the original statement (not equivalent).
- Statement 3: If angles XYZ and RST are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles.
- This is the contrapositive of the original statement (logically equivalent).
- Statement 4: If angles XYZ and RST are vertical angles, then they are not congruent.
- This statement is the negation of the original statement (not equivalent).
5. Conclusion:
The statement that is logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is: If angles XYZ and RST are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles.
Thus, the correct choice is statement 3.
1. Given statements:
[tex]\( p \)[/tex]: Angles XYZ and RST are vertical angles.
[tex]\( q \)[/tex]: Angles XYZ and RST are congruent.
2. Original statement:
[tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]: If angles XYZ and RST are vertical angles, then they are congruent.
3. Contrapositive:
The contrapositive of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\( \neg q \rightarrow \neg p \)[/tex].
This means: If angles XYZ and RST are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles.
4. Analyzing each of the provided statements:
- Statement 1: If angles XYZ and RST are congruent, then they are vertical angles.
- This is the converse of the original statement (not equivalent).
- Statement 2: If angles XYZ and RST are not vertical angles, then they are not congruent.
- This is the inverse of the original statement (not equivalent).
- Statement 3: If angles XYZ and RST are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles.
- This is the contrapositive of the original statement (logically equivalent).
- Statement 4: If angles XYZ and RST are vertical angles, then they are not congruent.
- This statement is the negation of the original statement (not equivalent).
5. Conclusion:
The statement that is logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is: If angles XYZ and RST are not congruent, then they are not vertical angles.
Thus, the correct choice is statement 3.
Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.