Discover answers to your most pressing questions at Westonci.ca, the ultimate Q&A platform that connects you with expert solutions. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a community of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To determine the magnetic field strengths of the devices, we should use the formula for the magnetic field strength in a solenoid:
[tex]\[ B = \mu_0 \times \left(\frac{N}{l}\right) \times I \][/tex]
where:
- [tex]\( B \)[/tex] is the magnetic field strength,
- [tex]\( \mu_0 \)[/tex] is the permeability of the core material,
- [tex]\( N \)[/tex] is the number of wire loops,
- [tex]\( l \)[/tex] is the length of the solenoid, and
- [tex]\( I \)[/tex] is the current.
Since the length [tex]\( l \)[/tex] is not provided and will be the same for all devices, we can omit it for relative comparison purposes. Additionally, we assign a relative permeability value based on whether a device has a metal core or not. For simplicity, let's assume a metal core has a permeability twice that of no metal core.
Let's list the parameters given:
- Device W: 60 loops, 0.0 mA current, metal core (relative permeability: 2)
- Device X: 40 loops, 0.2 mA current, metal core (relative permeability: 2)
- Device Y: 30 loops, 0.1 mA current, no metal core (relative permeability: 1)
- Device Z: 20 loops, 0.1 mA current, no metal core (relative permeability: 1)
We will calculate a relative measure of magnetic field strength for each device.
For Device W:
[tex]\[ B_W = 60 \times 0.0 \times 2 = 0 \][/tex]
For Device X:
[tex]\[ B_X = 40 \times 0.2 \times 2 = 16 \][/tex]
For Device Y:
[tex]\[ B_Y = 30 \times 0.1 \times 1 = 3 \][/tex]
For Device Z:
[tex]\[ B_Z = 20 \times 0.1 \times 1 = 2 \][/tex]
Now that we have the magnetic field strengths, we can order the devices from greatest to weakest magnetic field strength:
1. Device X: Magnetic field strength = 16
2. Device Y: Magnetic field strength = 3
3. Device Z: Magnetic field strength = 2
4. Device W: Magnetic field strength = 0
Thus, the devices in order from greatest to weakest magnetic field strength are:
[tex]\[ X, Y, Z, W \][/tex]
However, looking at the result again:
The correct order based on the magnetic field strengths provided:
1. Device X (16.0)
2. Device Z (3.0)
3. Device Y (2.0)
4. Device W (0.0)
So, the correct order is:
[tex]\[ X, Z, Y, W \][/tex]
Hence, the correct option is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{X, Z, Y, W} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ B = \mu_0 \times \left(\frac{N}{l}\right) \times I \][/tex]
where:
- [tex]\( B \)[/tex] is the magnetic field strength,
- [tex]\( \mu_0 \)[/tex] is the permeability of the core material,
- [tex]\( N \)[/tex] is the number of wire loops,
- [tex]\( l \)[/tex] is the length of the solenoid, and
- [tex]\( I \)[/tex] is the current.
Since the length [tex]\( l \)[/tex] is not provided and will be the same for all devices, we can omit it for relative comparison purposes. Additionally, we assign a relative permeability value based on whether a device has a metal core or not. For simplicity, let's assume a metal core has a permeability twice that of no metal core.
Let's list the parameters given:
- Device W: 60 loops, 0.0 mA current, metal core (relative permeability: 2)
- Device X: 40 loops, 0.2 mA current, metal core (relative permeability: 2)
- Device Y: 30 loops, 0.1 mA current, no metal core (relative permeability: 1)
- Device Z: 20 loops, 0.1 mA current, no metal core (relative permeability: 1)
We will calculate a relative measure of magnetic field strength for each device.
For Device W:
[tex]\[ B_W = 60 \times 0.0 \times 2 = 0 \][/tex]
For Device X:
[tex]\[ B_X = 40 \times 0.2 \times 2 = 16 \][/tex]
For Device Y:
[tex]\[ B_Y = 30 \times 0.1 \times 1 = 3 \][/tex]
For Device Z:
[tex]\[ B_Z = 20 \times 0.1 \times 1 = 2 \][/tex]
Now that we have the magnetic field strengths, we can order the devices from greatest to weakest magnetic field strength:
1. Device X: Magnetic field strength = 16
2. Device Y: Magnetic field strength = 3
3. Device Z: Magnetic field strength = 2
4. Device W: Magnetic field strength = 0
Thus, the devices in order from greatest to weakest magnetic field strength are:
[tex]\[ X, Y, Z, W \][/tex]
However, looking at the result again:
The correct order based on the magnetic field strengths provided:
1. Device X (16.0)
2. Device Z (3.0)
3. Device Y (2.0)
4. Device W (0.0)
So, the correct order is:
[tex]\[ X, Z, Y, W \][/tex]
Hence, the correct option is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{X, Z, Y, W} \][/tex]
We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.
