Explore Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A site that helps you find precise answers to your questions, no matter the topic. Our platform connects you with professionals ready to provide precise answers to all your questions in various areas of expertise. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.

Jordan used the distributive property to write an expression that is equivalent to [tex]\(6c - 48\)[/tex].

Is [tex]\(6c - 48\)[/tex] equivalent to [tex]\(6(c - 48)\)[/tex]?

A. Yes, Jordan's work is correct.
B. No, Jordan forgot to divide 48 by 6.
C. No, Jordan forgot to subtract 6 from 48.
D. No, Jordan forgot to multiply 6 and 48.


Sagot :

Let's analyze Jordan's work step by step to determine if it is correct or incorrect.

Jordan's original expression is:
[tex]\[ 6c - 48 \][/tex]

Jordan states that it is equivalent to:
[tex]\[ 6(c - 48) \][/tex]

To verify this, we can use the distributive property to expand Jordan's expression. The distributive property tells us that:
[tex]\[ a(b - c) = ab - ac \][/tex]

In Jordan's expression, [tex]\( a = 6 \)[/tex], [tex]\( b = c \)[/tex], and [tex]\( c = 48 \)[/tex], so if we expand it we get:
[tex]\[ 6(c - 48) = 6c - 6 \cdot 48 \][/tex]

Now, let's calculate [tex]\( 6 \cdot 48 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 6 \cdot 48 = 288 \][/tex]

So, the expanded form of Jordan's expression is:
[tex]\[ 6c - 288 \][/tex]

Now let's compare this to the original expression:
[tex]\[ 6c - 48 \][/tex]

We can see that:
[tex]\[ 6c - 48 \neq 6c - 288 \][/tex]

Therefore, Jordan's expression [tex]\( 6(c - 48) \)[/tex] is not equivalent to [tex]\( 6c - 48 \)[/tex]. It is clear that Jordan made a mistake. Specifically, Jordan forgot to divide 48 by 6 before placing it inside the parentheses.

Among the given choices, the correct answer is:
No, Jordan forgot to divide 48 by 6.