Answered

Westonci.ca is the best place to get answers to your questions, provided by a community of experienced and knowledgeable experts. Our platform connects you with professionals ready to provide precise answers to all your questions in various areas of expertise. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

Congress has passed a federal minimum wage law, yet the Constitution does not explicitly mention setting wages as part of Congress's powers. If the law were challenged, on what basis could the Supreme Court find that Congress acted within its scope?

A. The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution
B. The separate sovereigns doctrine
C. The expressed powers doctrine
D. The elastic clause of the Constitution

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

The Supreme Court could find Congress acted within its scope based on the expressed powers doctrine, necessary and proper clause, and elastic clause of the Constitution.


Explanation:

The Supreme Court could find that Congress acted within its scope based on the expressed powers doctrine, the implied powers granted by the necessary and proper clause, and the elastic clause of the Constitution. These clauses provide Congress with the authority to enact laws like setting a federal minimum wage, even though it is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution.


Learn more about Congress's scope in enacting laws here:

https://brainly.com/question/38840931


Thanks for stopping by. We are committed to providing the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.