Discover a world of knowledge at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts come together to answer your questions. Discover reliable solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.
Sagot :
To determine which reflection of the point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex] will produce an image at the same coordinates [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex], let's analyze the effect of reflecting the point across each given axis and line.
1. Reflection across the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis:
- For a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis results in the point [tex]\((x, -y)\)[/tex].
- For our specific point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis would yield the point [tex]\((0, -k)\)[/tex], which is not the same as the original point unless [tex]\( k = 0 \)[/tex]. Therefore, this option does not generally give us [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex].
2. Reflection across the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis:
- For a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis results in the point [tex]\((-x, y)\)[/tex].
- For our specific point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis would yield the point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex], which is exactly the same as the original point. Thus, this reflection maintains the coordinates.
3. Reflection across the line [tex]\( y = x \)[/tex]:
- For a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the line [tex]\( y = x \)[/tex] results in the point [tex]\((y, x)\)[/tex].
- For our specific point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the line [tex]\( y = x \)[/tex] would yield the point [tex]\((k, 0)\)[/tex], which is different from the original point unless [tex]\( k = 0 \)[/tex]. Hence, this option does not generally give us [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex].
4. Reflection across the line [tex]\( y = -x \)[/tex]:
- For a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the line [tex]\( y = -x \)[/tex] results in the point [tex]\((-y, -x)\)[/tex].
- For our specific point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the line [tex]\( y = -x \)[/tex] would yield the point [tex]\((-k, 0)\)[/tex], which is once again different from the original point unless [tex]\( k = 0 \)[/tex]. So, this option also does not generally give us [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex].
Upon examining all the reflections, the only reflection that results in the point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex] remaining unchanged is the reflection across the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis.
Therefore, the correct reflection is across the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis, which corresponds to the second option.
1. Reflection across the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis:
- For a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis results in the point [tex]\((x, -y)\)[/tex].
- For our specific point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis would yield the point [tex]\((0, -k)\)[/tex], which is not the same as the original point unless [tex]\( k = 0 \)[/tex]. Therefore, this option does not generally give us [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex].
2. Reflection across the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis:
- For a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis results in the point [tex]\((-x, y)\)[/tex].
- For our specific point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis would yield the point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex], which is exactly the same as the original point. Thus, this reflection maintains the coordinates.
3. Reflection across the line [tex]\( y = x \)[/tex]:
- For a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the line [tex]\( y = x \)[/tex] results in the point [tex]\((y, x)\)[/tex].
- For our specific point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the line [tex]\( y = x \)[/tex] would yield the point [tex]\((k, 0)\)[/tex], which is different from the original point unless [tex]\( k = 0 \)[/tex]. Hence, this option does not generally give us [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex].
4. Reflection across the line [tex]\( y = -x \)[/tex]:
- For a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the line [tex]\( y = -x \)[/tex] results in the point [tex]\((-y, -x)\)[/tex].
- For our specific point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the line [tex]\( y = -x \)[/tex] would yield the point [tex]\((-k, 0)\)[/tex], which is once again different from the original point unless [tex]\( k = 0 \)[/tex]. So, this option also does not generally give us [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex].
Upon examining all the reflections, the only reflection that results in the point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex] remaining unchanged is the reflection across the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis.
Therefore, the correct reflection is across the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis, which corresponds to the second option.
We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.
