The Divine Right of Kings clashes with the social contract theory as it places monarchs above the law and people, while the latter emphasizes mutual consent and rights protection.
The Divine Right of Kings asserts that a monarch's authority comes directly from God and is not subject to earthly control. On the other hand, the social contract theory, as proposed by philosophers like Locke and Rousseau, suggests that government legitimacy stems from the consent of the governed through an agreement that protects their rights.
This clash arises as the Divine Right ideology places the monarch above the people and laws, while the social contract theory empowers individuals by establishing a mutual agreement between the governed and the governing, emphasizing the importance of consent and accountability.
For instance, in the social contract theory, individuals willingly surrender some freedoms to secure protection and rights, contrasting sharply with the absolute authority claimed by the Divine Right of Kings.
https://brainly.com/question/11448920
