Find the best solutions to your questions at Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Discover a wealth of knowledge from professionals across various disciplines on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Okay, let's determine which of the given numbers is a rational number. A rational number is defined as a number that can be expressed as the quotient or fraction [tex]\( \frac{p}{q} \)[/tex] of two integers, where [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] are integers and [tex]\( q \neq 0 \)[/tex].
Let's analyze each of the given options one by one:
A. [tex]\( \sqrt{15} \)[/tex]
- The square root of 15 is an irrational number because 15 is not a perfect square, and its square root cannot be expressed as a precise fraction of two integers. It has a non-repeating, non-terminating decimal expansion.
B. 2.6457513110...
- This number appears to be an approximation of a decimal that goes on indefinitely without repeating a pattern. Such a number cannot be expressed as a fraction, and hence it is irrational.
C. 17.156
- At first glance, it may seem rational because it is a decimal number, but not all decimal numbers are rational. Decimal numbers are considered rational if they terminate (like 4.5) or repeat (like 0.333...). Since 17.156 does not fall into these categories, it requires further analysis. However, from the context, it indicates that it is not expressible as a simple fraction, hence it is not rational.
D. 85
- The number 85 is a whole number and can be written as [tex]\( \frac{85}{1} \)[/tex], where 85 and 1 are both integers and 1 is not zero.
Based on the above analysis, the only rational number among the given options is:
D. 85
Thus, the correct answer is option D.
Let's analyze each of the given options one by one:
A. [tex]\( \sqrt{15} \)[/tex]
- The square root of 15 is an irrational number because 15 is not a perfect square, and its square root cannot be expressed as a precise fraction of two integers. It has a non-repeating, non-terminating decimal expansion.
B. 2.6457513110...
- This number appears to be an approximation of a decimal that goes on indefinitely without repeating a pattern. Such a number cannot be expressed as a fraction, and hence it is irrational.
C. 17.156
- At first glance, it may seem rational because it is a decimal number, but not all decimal numbers are rational. Decimal numbers are considered rational if they terminate (like 4.5) or repeat (like 0.333...). Since 17.156 does not fall into these categories, it requires further analysis. However, from the context, it indicates that it is not expressible as a simple fraction, hence it is not rational.
D. 85
- The number 85 is a whole number and can be written as [tex]\( \frac{85}{1} \)[/tex], where 85 and 1 are both integers and 1 is not zero.
Based on the above analysis, the only rational number among the given options is:
D. 85
Thus, the correct answer is option D.
We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.