Answered

Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to a wide range of questions, backed by a knowledgeable community. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Supreme Court determined that
laws that promote a particular religion may be allowed if they:
о
a.) don't involve federal funds.
о
b.) also serve a secular purpose.
4
c.) inhibit other religious practices.
d.) are Christian in nature.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Supreme Court established the Lemon Test to determine the constitutionality of laws related to religion in government.


Explanation:

Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) introduced the Lemon Test to determine the constitutionality of laws involving religion in government. This test states that for a law to be considered constitutional, it must have a legitimate secular purpose, its primary effect must not advance or inhibit religion, and there should be no excessive entanglement between government and religion.


Learn more about Lemon v. Kurtzman here:

https://brainly.com/question/30767086


We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.