Answered

Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform, offering detailed and reliable answers from a knowledgeable community. Discover comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our user-friendly platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

Dr. Simpson found a +.50 correlation between ice cream cone sales and violent
crimes in a community. Which of the following represents the best interpretation of
this result?
Multiple Choice
О
О
Ice cream causes people to become more violent and
aggressive.
Ice cream consumption is not related to violent crime.
A third variable, such as heat, may account for the
association between ice cream sales and violent crime.
Violent people like ice cream more than nonviolent
people.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

A +.50 correlation between ice cream sales and violent crimes does not indicate causation; a third variable likely influences both. Understanding the correlation-causation fallacy is crucial in interpreting such data.


Explanation:

A +.50 correlation between ice cream cone sales and violent crimes does not mean ice cream causes violence. The most plausible explanation is the presence of a third variable, such as heat, influencing both ice cream sales and crime rates. This demonstrates the correlation-causation fallacy where a correlation does not necessarily imply causation.


Learn more about Correlation and Causation here:

https://brainly.com/question/30912507


Thanks for using our service. We aim to provide the most accurate answers for all your queries. Visit us again for more insights. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.