kittygirl123
Answered

Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, brought to you by a community of experts. Ask your questions and receive accurate answers from professionals with extensive experience in various fields on our platform. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.

Which statements accurately describe arguments made against President Bush's decision to invade Iraq in 2003?

Choose all answers that are correct.

A.
Invading Iraq would divert attention and resources from the goal of destroying al-Qaeda.

B.
Saddam Hussein was a moderate leader and an important ally of Israel.

C.
The Iraqi army and air force were too strong for the U.S. military to defeat.

D.
UN inspectors needed more time to determine if Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.

Sagot :

0Claudia0
"A. Invading Iraq would divert attention and resources from the goal of destroying al-Qaeda." describes the arguments that were made against President Bush's decision to invade Iraq in 2003.
~Hope this helped :)

Answer:

Options A and D. The statements that accurately describe arguments made against President Bush's decision to invade Iraq in 2003 were that invading Iraq would divert attention and resources from the goal of destroying Al-Qaeda, and that the UN inspectors needed more time to determine if Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.

Explanation:

One of the main arguments that held those who oppose President Bush's decision to invade Iraq in 2003 was that going to war with the middle eastern country was illegal, as UN inspectors were investigating whether or not the country had weapons of mass production, but no decision of enforcement was made, and even if that was a possibility, the UN Security Council had to vote before any invasion occurring.

The other argument was that there were no direct evidence that connected Iraq with the terrorist group of Al-Qaeda that was the responsible for the 9/11 attacks. Therefore the argument that invading Iraq would divert attention and resources from the goal of destroying Al-Qaeda, a goal that had logical reasoning to be supported.

We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.