Explore Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A site where experts provide accurate and helpful answers to all your questions. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
The Gibbons v. Ogden court case in a nutshell:
Ogden had a monopoly on operating steamboats on the Lower Mississippi.
Gibbons, who had a federal liscence to operate steamboats, tried to start business there and was sued by Ogden.
The ruling was that Gibbons would be allowed to operate there, which gave precedent to federal law over state law.
Ogden had a monopoly on operating steamboats on the Lower Mississippi.
Gibbons, who had a federal liscence to operate steamboats, tried to start business there and was sued by Ogden.
The ruling was that Gibbons would be allowed to operate there, which gave precedent to federal law over state law.
Answer: The case set definitions for navigation and placed federal control over all coastal and river trade.
Explanation:
We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.