Answered

Discover answers to your questions with Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A platform that connects you with knowledgeable experts. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

What was the effect of the Dred Scott decision? Congress could not prohibit slavery. Slavery was abolished in the South. Maine was admitted as a slave state.

Sagot :

The primary effect of the Dred Scott decision, based only on the option in this list, was that "Congress could not prohibit slavery," but mostly it meant that blacks weren't considered citizens and thus could not sue for their freedom.
francocanacari

Answer:

The effect of the Dred Scott decision was that Congress could not prohibit slavery.

Explanation:

The case Dred Scott v. Sandford was a judicial claim, crucial in the history of the United States, resolved by the Supreme Court of that country in 1857, in which it was decided to deprive any inhabitant of African descent, whether slaves or not, the right to citizenship; and the authority to prohibit slavery in federal territories of the country was removed from Congress. The decision was drafted by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney. The fury that caused this ruling among the abolitionists was an important factor in the explosion of the Civil War.

Thanks for using our service. We aim to provide the most accurate answers for all your queries. Visit us again for more insights. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.