Welcome to Westonci.ca, the ultimate question and answer platform. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately. Explore a wealth of knowledge from professionals across various disciplines on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.
Sagot :
It is false that an advantageous mutation is more likely to get fixed in a population through genetic drift than is a deleterious mutation.
Genetic drift is described as the random change in the frequency of a mutation in a population from generation to generation induced by the population's finite size. Most beneficial mutations are lost owing to genetic drift; however, some somewhat damaging mutations may become permanent.
It takes a long time to detect a significant influence of genetic drift on allele frequencies in large, unthreatened populations; genetic diversity indicates a balance between mutation and natural selection. When natural selection is much less than one, drift can counter selection, and alleles behave as if they are neutral. As a result of this process, small populations may exhibit more maladaptation (i.e., a mismatch between environment and mean phenotype) than larger populations. Mildly harmful mutations, on the other hand, will likely accumulate in small populations since selection is unsuccessful at eliminating them. This can result in a'mutational meltdown,' in which harmful mutations drive down population growth rate (and size), rendering the population more susceptible to subsequent mutation fixation.
To learn more about mutation. Click, https://brainly.com/question/13254694
#SPJ4
Thank you for your visit. We are dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.
