OoItzCuteAngeloO2
Answered

Looking for reliable answers? Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform where experts share their knowledge on various topics. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

state two reasons why historians refute the claim that the British introduced the rule of law in India ??​

Sagot :

gautamarvind37

Historicians refute the claim that the

British introduced the rule of law in

India on account of two main reasons,

Firstly, colonial law was not devoid of

arbitrariness. The Sedition act of 1870

bears testimony to this. This Act allowed

the police to arrest any person protesting

against the British government, without

due trial.

Secondly, Indian nationalists played a

pivotal role in the framing of the Indian

Constitution that upholds equality of all

to law.

Hence, historians vehemently refute the

claim that the British introduced the role

of law to India, because Indians were

constantly discriminated against in

various spheres of the social, political

and administrative life of the country.

We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Westonci.ca is committed to providing accurate answers. Come back soon for more trustworthy information.