Find the best solutions to your questions at Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Connect with a community of experts ready to help you find solutions to your questions quickly and accurately. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Research results do not prove hypotheses because inductive reasoning is based on probabilities, not proof.
What is inductive reasoning?
Inductive reasoning can be defined as a process that involves drawing and arriving at a general conclusion (conjecture), especially by critically observing a pattern that's based on a sequence, probabilities, or specific instances.
What is a hypothesis?
In Science, a hypothesis is primarily considered to be a tentative or an educated guess and it can be defined as a testable explanation for an observation or a specific experimentation (scientific) problem, especially by using the "if . . . then . . . because" format..
In this context, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that research results do not prove hypotheses because inductive reasoning is based on probabilities, not proof.
Read more on hypothesis here: https://brainly.com/question/146342
#SPJ1
Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed with our latest expert advice.