yuphuobhj
Answered

Westonci.ca offers fast, accurate answers to your questions. Join our community and get the insights you need now. Connect with a community of experts ready to help you find solutions to your questions quickly and accurately. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.

A man is arrested for a crime. At the police station, police question him, and he confesses. His lawyer later argues that the police should have informed the man he had the right to ask for a lawyer before speaking. The Supreme Court rules that the man, and others suspected of a crime, must be informed of their constitutional rights when they are arrested.


Which Supreme Court case does this summary describe?

A.
In re Gault
B.
Gideon v. Wainwright
C.
Tinker v. Des Moines
D.
Miranda v. Arizona

Sagot :

sc0999060

Answer:

C. Tinker v. des moines

I hope this is the correct answer

Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.