Answered

Discover a world of knowledge at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts come together to answer your questions. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.

The Smith family has very little money and no health insurance. A researcher approaches them and promises free health care for their three children for two years if he can subject the children to a series of experimental vaccines. However, the researcher does not disclose that the vaccine may have serious side effects. The Smiths elect to participate, being unaware of the dangers involved. According to the American Psychological Association [APA] code of ethics, the researcher is violating the principle of:

Sagot :

abiolataiwo2015

According to the American Psychological Association [APA] code of ethics, the researcher is violating the principle of: informed consent.

What is informed consent?

Informed consent  states that a client or patient should  have enough information about the medical care they are going  to receive from a health practitioner before allowing the practitioner to care for them.

Based on the given scenario the researcher violated the principle of informed consent because he did not disclose that the vaccine may have side effect.

Therefore  the researcher is violating the principle of: informed consent.

Learn more about informed consent here:https://brainly.com/question/26830148

#SPJ1

Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. We're here to help at Westonci.ca. Keep visiting for the best answers to your questions.