ZimaLeisure0
Answered

Find the best solutions to your questions at Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.

Explain the pros and cons of choosing leaders based on their achieved status rather than
their ascribed status.


Sagot :

jaquelinefvr

The pros of choosing leaders based on achieved status is choosing based on individual efforts and merits.

The cons, on the other hand, correspond to the high expectations that individuals may have about the leader based on their characteristics.

What is assigned and achieved status?

The ascribed status is a concept that refers to the status that an individual receives at the time of his birth, that is, without reference to his individual qualities.

Achieved status, on the other hand, is related to the individual's skills and achievements acquired through personal effort.

Therefore, choosing a leader based on achieved status can be positive because it is based on innate qualities and proven skills necessary for leadership.

Find out more about achieved status here:

https://brainly.com/question/26412432

Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.