Answered

Discover the answers you need at Westonci.ca, a dynamic Q&A platform where knowledge is shared freely by a community of experts. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.

CRITICAL THINKING EXERCISE 1
Please read and consider the following clinical examples. What is your reaction to each example? How would you handle the situation if you were a part of the conversation or overheard either conversation?



• Situation 1: You receive report on a new admission who is coming in with pancreatitis. During report,
you are told that the woman’s primary language is Spanish. After you share this information with the admitting physician, the physician states, “Oh, great! I sure hope she has somebody with her who can speak English. You KNOW what a pain it is to set up and use the translator system. What am I saying?! She is sure to have SOMEONE with her who speaks English. Those people ALWAYS come in packs.”

Situation 2: You are at the nurses’ station and overhear the following conversation: Person 1: “I need to know which patient is going home so that I can write discharge orders.” Person 2: “The Indian family.” Person 1 (laughing): “Indian how? Red dot or red feather?”

Sagot :

lheduardomarques

The Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (UDBDH)

The two cases are similar, according to The Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (UDBDH), they are however wrong towards people of another nationality, remembering that ethnic discrimination can lead to crime.

The Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (UDBDH), unanimously ratified by the 191 Member States of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) in 2005, recognized human rights as a reference universal minimum for bioethics. The Declaration's structural axes are justice, recognition of the dignity of the human person, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. By including social and environmental issues, it expanded the scope of bioethics and recovered the original meaning given by Potter to this new territory of knowledge, when, in 1970, he used the term to refer to the need for a field of knowledge that dealt with human survival, which was founded on an alliance between biological knowledge and ethical values.

Stigma, discrimination, identity, tolerance... The social context of bioethics

Article 11 of the DUBDH, when stating that discrimination and stigmatization constitute violations of human dignity, refers to the concept that stigma and human dignity are intrinsically associated; one exists only in the negation of the other. Stigma is only produced or materialized to the extent that their dignity is removed from the other, when the other is diminished in what constitutes him as a human being, when he is inferior and considered below other human beings.

With this, we can say that the answer to both cases would be to recriminate the author of racial slurs.

learn more https://brainly.com/question/3444313?referrer=searchResults

We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.