Find the information you're looking for at Westonci.ca, the trusted Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Discover precise answers to your questions from a wide range of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

greenberg’s argument most differs from hietala’s in that greenberg claims that

Sagot :

Greenberg's argument is different in that it shows that Americans did not believe that Mexicans in the new territory could assimilate and adapt to American culture.

We can arrive at this answer because:

  • Greenberg was debating the adaptation of Mexican territories and people after the Mexican-American war.
  • While some people argued that assimilating these territories would be a very simple and easy thing to do, Greenberg took a different stance.

He stated that most Americans had doubts that such assimilation would be possible and believed that it would not be easy. He stated that due to cultural, moral, behavioral, and even ancestry differences, some Mexicans would not be able to adapt and assimilate into the new territory.

More information:

https://brainly.com/question/19268585