Looking for reliable answers? Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform where experts share their knowledge on various topics. Discover reliable solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.
Sagot :
I can't conveniently copy the logical symbols you use, so I write
AND = ∧ (conjunction)
OR = ∨ (disjunction)
NOT = ¬
Tautologically,
p = (p AND q) OR (p AND NOT q)
and we can distribute the OR to get the equivalent statement
(p OR (p AND NOT q)) AND (q OR (p AND NOT q))
and again to get
((p OR p) AND (p OR NOT q)) AND ((p OR q) AND (q OR NOT q))
Now, q OR NOT q is always true, and p OR p is simply p, so we have
p = p AND (p OR q) AND (p OR NOT q)
This shows that p OR NOT q is already included in p, so our initial statement is simply
p AND (NOT p OR NOT q)
Distributing the conjunction, we get
(p AND NOT p) OR (p AND NOT q)
p AND NOT p is tautologically false, but we're considering a disjunction, so the truth value of p AND NOT q is the only value that's relevant. So, the initial statement collapses to
p AND NOT q
Visit us again for up-to-date and reliable answers. We're always ready to assist you with your informational needs. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.