Answered

Westonci.ca offers quick and accurate answers to your questions. Join our community and get the insights you need today. Join our Q&A platform and get accurate answers to all your questions from professionals across multiple disciplines. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.

a political scientist or historian reviewing the opinions of chief justice john marshall in cases like mcculloch v. maryland and gibbons v. ogden would be most likely to characterize his judicial philosophy in what way?

Sagot :

Baraq

By considering the opinions of Chief Justice John Marshall in cases like McCulloch v. Maryland and Gibbons v. Ogden, a political scientist or historian would likely characterize Chief Justice John Marshall's judicial philosophy as:

"the promoter of the supremacy of the Constitution, the Congress jurisdiction, and the federal government over the states."

This is evident in the case of Gibbons v. Ogden, where he supported the idea that Congress had the power to regulate interstate commerce using Article I Section 8 of the US Constitution to make the ruling.

Also, McCulloch v. Maryland supported the idea that the federal government has jurisdiction over States, using the "Necessary and Proper" Clause of the U.S. Constitution as the basis.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that Chief Justice John Marshall's judicial philosophy helped define some of the major legal issues in American history.

Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/14437585

We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.