Discover the answers you need at Westonci.ca, a dynamic Q&A platform where knowledge is shared freely by a community of experts. Get the answers you need quickly and accurately from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.

PLZ HELP FAST
A scientist performed an experiment on mice. Her results are posted below.

After analyzing her results she stated that a mouse must be exposed to more than 500 days of cigarette smoke before the mouse can get lung cancer.
Do you agree with the scientist conclusions?

A.) yes; there is no evidence to support the idea that a mouse can get lung cancer without being exposed to cigarette smoke for more than 500 days.

B.) No; there is no evidence to support the idea that cigarette smoke exposure will lead to lung cancer in mice.

C.) No; some mice may have developed lung cancer in less than 500 days of cigarette smoke exposure.

D.) Yes; the majority of the lung cancer cases were the result of more than 500 days of cigarette smoke exposure.


PLZ HELP FAST A Scientist Performed An Experiment On Mice Her Results Are Posted Below After Analyzing Her Results She Stated That A Mouse Must Be Exposed To Mo class=

Sagot :

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Because there is a 500 day gap in the evidence, some mice may have gotten cancer on the first day, or the 499th day.

Answer:

A

Explanation:

I think it's A since her grounds or conclusions are not accurate because there is no evidence to abet the idea that a mouse can get lung cancer without being exposed to cigarette smoke.

B is not accurate since an experiment was performed.

Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.