Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to a wide range of questions, backed by a knowledgeable community. Our platform connects you with professionals ready to provide precise answers to all your questions in various areas of expertise. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

Why should flag burning not be protected by the first amendment?

Sagot :

Answer and Explanation:

This act is protected under the First Amendment, although it is rude and offensive, and when seen as in a political view, almost like a threat to whoever's country the flag is from.

It is protected because it shows "symbolic speech", which is protected under the amendment.

An example of symbolic speech that was used was seen with the Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court Case. The case was that students at a school were wearing black armbands to symbolize their opinion on the Vietnam war. Tinker won the case because they are allowed free speech. They also didn't speak about it or make any remark about the war, which helped in them winning the case.

Opinions that can be made against the protection of this act is that it is offensive to people, and seen as disrespectful from whoever.

#teamtrees #PAW (Plant And Water)

I hope this helps!