Answered

Get reliable answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where our knowledgeable community is always ready to help. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our platform. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.

Why does Jackson
admit that secession
may be a “revolutionary
act” but not a
“constitutional right”?

Sagot :

Brandtley12
It would be a revolutionary act because it caused a revolutionary war among citizens of the same country and not a constitutional right because states admitted to the United States belong to the United States unless otherwise appointed and approved by government officials. Texas is the only state that has any possible way to secede without asking the government to do so.
Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.