Welcome to Westonci.ca, where your questions are met with accurate answers from a community of experts and enthusiasts. Discover a wealth of knowledge from experts across different disciplines on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.
Sagot :
Below, there are two paragraphs comparing and contrasting the two quotes:
Both the quote by American writer Kurt Vonnegut and the quote by Greek philosopher Plato discuss writing and the fact that it is associated with being seen as smart or wise. Therefore, both men acknowledge that writing gives others the impression that the one who writes is an intelligent person.
However, the quote by Vonnegut sees that fact as an advantage, a perk or, as he puts it, a "great thing." On the other hand, Plato uses that fact as an argument against writing, which means he sees it as a disadvantage, maybe even a danger. It is deceitful to convey the impression of being smarter than one actually is.
- When writing a paragraph comparing two things, our purpose is to highlight their similarities. That is what we did in the first paragraph above. The two quotes have the same theme, which is writing, and they both agree that writing can make people seem smarter than they are.
- When writing a paragraph contrasting two things, the objective is to look for and point out the differences between them. That is what we did in the second paragraph above. The two quotes say the same thing, but one does so in a positive manner while the other does it with a negative connotation.
Learn more about the topic here:
https://brainly.com/question/18478951?referrer=searchResults
We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.