Looking for answers? Westonci.ca is your go-to Q&A platform, offering quick, trustworthy responses from a community of experts. Discover comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our user-friendly platform. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Using function concepts, we have that:
The actual percentage of smokers in 2010 was of 23%, while the estimated was of 13%, thus, the model underestimated the percentage by 10%.
-----------------------------
The function is:
[tex]p + \frac{x}{2} = 33[/tex]
In which
- p is the percentage of smokers.
- x is the number of years after 1970.
The percentage can be written as a function of the number of years, that is:
[tex]p(x) = 33 - \frac{x}{2}[/tex]
-----------------------------
2010 is 2010 - 1970 = 40 years after 1970, thus, the estimate of the percentage in 2010 is:
[tex]p(40) = 33 - \frac{40}{2} = 33 - 20 = 13[/tex]
The actual percentage of smokers in 2010 was of 23%, while the estimated was of 13%, thus, the model underestimated the percentage by 10%.
A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/24481455
We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.
