Answered

At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the answers you need, thanks to our active and informed community. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.

Negating conditional statement (a V ~ b) => c

Please show your work and give a proper answer

Negating Conditional Statement A V B Gt C Please Show Your Work And Give A Proper Answer class=

Sagot :

LammettHash

"p implies q" is equivalent to "(p and q) or not p", which in turn is equivalent to "(p or not p) and (q or not p)". But "p or not p" is always true, so the implication reduces completely to "not p or q". Negating an implication thus gives "not (not p or q)", which is equivalent to "p and not q".

So

not [(a or not b) implies c]   <==>  (a or not b) and not c

Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.