Answered

Westonci.ca is the best place to get answers to your questions, provided by a community of experienced and knowledgeable experts. Explore thousands of questions and answers from knowledgeable experts in various fields on our Q&A platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.

Trial practice is dramatically different in Britain. The lawyers for the two sides, called solicitors, do not go into court. Courtroom work is done by different lawyers, called barristers. The barristers are not permitted to interview any witnesses before trial. They know the substance of what each witness intends to say but do not rehearse questions and answers, as in the United States. Which approach do you consider more effective

Sagot :

anthougo

Answer:

The British approach appears to be more effective and even more efficient.

Explanation:

The British approach eliminates the tendency of lawyers to coach the witnesses to produce required answers.  This means that using the British approach, witnesses are not properly prepared with correctly rehearsed answers to questions.  The discovery of the case by both lawyers happens in the courtroom and not at a pretrial stage.  With the British approach, courtroom lawyers are responsible for conducting the opening statement, direct examination of witnesses, closing statement, and cross-examination of witnesses.

Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.