Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, provided by a community of experts. Connect with professionals on our platform to receive accurate answers to your questions quickly and efficiently. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
The answer is "Option b"
Step-by-step explanation:
Through this context, it is determined that the p-value is much less than 0.05, which is 0.021, so the rejection of the null hypothesis at 5%. There should be enough evidence to demonstrate that now the effect of the organization was substantial on how long it has taken to solve the issue. This result is statistically important.
The correct conclusion about this data is (b) The effect of training on how long it takes to solve the problem was significant, F(2, 27) = 4.47, p < 05.
From the table, we have the following values
F = 4.467
df between group = 2
df within group = 27
To reference the result, we make use of:
F(df between group, df within group) = F value
So, we have:
F(2, 27) = 4.47
The above result shows the F value approximated to two decimal points
Hence, the correct conclusion about this data is (b) The effect of training on how long it takes to solve the problem was significant, F(2, 27) = 4.47, p < 05.
Read more about APA styles at:
https://brainly.com/question/858964
Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Find reliable answers at Westonci.ca. Visit us again for the latest updates and expert advice.