irisr7475
Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions are answered by a community of knowledgeable contributors. Discover comprehensive answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our user-friendly platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

Please helpp.
Korematsu v.United States (1944)

In Korematsu v. the United States, you read about Japanese Americans being singled out and detained,
without trial, specifically because of their race/ethnicity. In your opinion, are there any circumstances
under which you see such actions as being acceptable? Is national security more important than
constitutional rights? Explain your answers.


Sagot :

Azinadangol

Answer:

hope it helps ... stay safe

Explanation:

United States, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court, on December 18, 1944, upheld (6–3) the conviction of Fred Korematsu—a son of Japanese immigrants who was born in Oakland, California—for having violated an exclusion order requiring him to submit to forced relocation during World War II.

Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.