Welcome to Westonci.ca, where your questions are met with accurate answers from a community of experts and enthusiasts. Get immediate and reliable answers to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment. Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."
We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.
