Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to a wide range of questions, backed by a knowledgeable community. Get the answers you need quickly and accurately from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.
Sagot :
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the given information:
Original diameter of the sample = 10 mm
Diameter increases by 0.4 mm
It means that the New diameter[tex]= 10+0.4 = 10.4 mm[/tex]
The change in diameter = new diameter - original diameter [tex]= (10.4 - 10) mm[/tex]
Transverse strain = [tex]\dfrac{change \ in \ diameter }{original \ diameter}[/tex]
= [tex]\dfrac{(10.4 - 10) }{10}[/tex]
= 0.04 mm
Original height = 3 mm
Reduction in the height = 20%
New height = [tex]3 -( 3*20) mm= 2.4 mm[/tex]
Change in height = new height - original height
[tex]= (2.4 - 3) mm[/tex]
Longitudinal strain = [tex]\dfrac{change \ in \ height }{original \ height}[/tex]
[tex]=\dfrac{(2.4 - 3)}{3}[/tex]
= - 0.2 mm
Now;
Poisson’s ratio of sample = [tex]- \dfrac{transverse \ strain }{ longitudinal \ strain}[/tex]
= [tex]\dfrac{- (0.04) }{ (-0.2)}[/tex]
= 0.2
From the given statement, Poisson’s ratio of sample is less than 0.1
However, in the estimation of our data, it is 0.2
This implies that It fails the screening test.
Thanks for using our service. We aim to provide the most accurate answers for all your queries. Visit us again for more insights. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.