Answered

At Westonci.ca, we make it easy for you to get the answers you need from a community of knowledgeable individuals. Join our Q&A platform and connect with professionals ready to provide precise answers to your questions in various areas. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

What was the impact of the US Supreme Court's decision in Miranda v Arizona (1966)?
O Police were required to have a search warrant to search a suspect's dwelling.
O Minors were given the same "due process" rights as adults
O Suspects had to be told of their right to have an attorney present or to remain silent during police interrogations.
O Defendants accused of serious crimes had to be provided with a state-sponsored public defender
mmm

Sagot :

Answer:

C/the third one

Explanation:

Suspects had to be told of their right to have an attorney present or to remain silent during police interrogations.

0412919

Answer:

C

Explanation:

i answerd it and got it correct

Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.